Aug
2011
The Unreality of Reality
It seems like every other show being released around the world these days is a reality based concept where people are challeneged to complete big tasks in short amounts of time with the possibility of one of them taking home a large and exciting prize, possibly life changing to boot.
I have been briefed by media agencies across the board, explaning that younger mums are the bullseye for this show format. That they are engaged by characters that they can relate to, doubled down with subject matter that relates to love, cooking or home improvement.
Australian television seems full of reality shows, from Masterchef cooking challenges to renovate this place, they all seem to blend into one extremely similiar mass. It got me thinking, what can be learned by this rush into content by the braodcasters in Australia that we can learn from in creating new content for any platform.
Adding drama to reality makes it less real.
A ubiquitous cliffhanger at each ad break quickly becomes not a element of anticipation, but a cue to get up and finish the dishes.
Formulas make it much easier to make TV. An idea becomes a saleable franchise that can be produced by anyone. Results become repeatable and in evry essence, you get a show, something to tune into that delivers a relaible result week after week. It’s a programming maxim that has survived since the formats inception. People like the reliability of loving Lucy.
I think that the problem occurs when you start to notice the formula more than the content itself. When repitition frames an ad break it’s a good sign that editing for drama has superceded reality.
Context is key in content
When the drama of the show supercedes the content, it becomes less interesting to your core committed audience of fans.
When any correlation of attention in the media begins, it is led by a group of the most interested. They might be foodies, home handymen, seasoned travellers or even just like arguing about stuff. These folk are the committed core that not only talk about their topic of interst themsleves, they see it as their mission to convert their friends and families to become fans to. These guys explain the history, educate and editorialise, they’re a valuable asset to any person trying to grow an audience for an idea.
While it’s true that this pointy end of the audience tends to be the first to leave, moving inexorably on to find the next big thing to introduce to their friends and acquire social capital around, the writers and producers of many relaity shows don’t seem to understand that by moving the focus of the story away from the content topic to amplify drama alienates these fans. Sure, they might spend a couple of seasons trolling from the sidelines that the show does not now contain much of the subject it started out with, but the mass audience you’ll be left with once they’re gone are no where near as passionate about talking about things.
Saturation is not effective, it’s boring.
A slightly different take on what is currently playing on the other channel might seem like a sound strategic move, but which is likely to draw more attention and eyeballs: something similar but possibly better (or worse) or something completely different? If I am watching a show about home renovations,
The difficulty we seem to continually face up to as humans a desire to recreate things that have been successful before. If we copy something that is successful, innovative and attracts all important attention, then we seem justifiably entitled to believe that we will get a similiar result.
Flashmobs are a great example of this effect. The first t-mobile flashmobs to break out big online where great to watch. They showed that everyday life can throw up the unexpected and reasonably laddered to the brand benefit of t-mobile is a great way to share the everyday amazements with the people you care about. Unfortunately, everyone else thought they could get the same type of result. See for yourself where this type of thinking takes you.





