Welcome to Collective Conversation Sign in | Join | Help

Measurement PRoponent / PRomulgator

 
Musings about all things communications measurement: myths, milestones, metrics, missteps, best practices.

Media Measurement @ Microsoft

Representatives from Microsoft and Cymfony are addressing the IPR measurement conference delegation with a presentation entitled: The Next Generation of Enterprise Measurement for Enterprise.  (To be clear they’re talking only about media measurement).  You’d expect a company like Microsoft to have a data rich / savvy / hungry culture.  And they are, clearly.  So when the issue of measuring (editorial and social media coverage anyway…oh, and buzz, too, though I’m not fond of that term) came up, there was a desire to arrive at a single number that represents the quality of the coverage and to track that number over time.  I appreciate the context–they are the most written about organization on the planet–and I appreciate the need to solve what Microsoft calls measurement anarchy–they had multiple editorial measurement systems in place.  However, I worry about the danger in reducing something as complex as PR and scads of media content analysis data to one number.  As a colleague of mine points out, a single score for media coverage (however complex the methodology used to generate it) is a bit like getting a 4.7 from the Russian ice dancing judge.  Wonderful, but what does that mean?  The alternative?  More data and more analysis, and using the ice dancing analogy, akin to sitting down with your coach and reviewing a video of your performance and discussing it in great detail.  The whole point of measurement and the data it yields is to provide extra depth and insight to communications.  Now, certainly not all organizations are created equal and not all organiztions will want to (or should) measure alike, so whatever works for you and whatever floats your boat, I suppose.  But a little information is a dangerous thing. 

In fairness to Microsoft and Cymfony, we haven’t and aren’t likely to see behind the methodological curtain.  Still, what’s not clear, and this is my hope for Microsoft, is whether or not this single number can be reversed or deconstructed to go back to more rich data that may lie behind it for more in-depth analysis.  Also, what's not yet happening, Microsoft and Cymfony admit, are attempts to link this score to other market, brand, employee and reputation research.


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Published 04 October 2007 11:10 by Alan Chumley

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

  • Michael Blowers said:

    I wish it were only Microsoft using this sort of analysis but evidence seems to be that they are spreading, 'dubbing-down' the true value of PR. If accountants were only employed to provide a profit or loss figure would they be less important?...absolutely. PR research is not mearly there to put a tick in the box. It should be mechanism understand what has been and enable changes to enhance the future. I feel you have heard this all before! Many thanks for the skating analogy I mentioned on my blog (I have added a link to your original comment).  

    October 18, 2007 08:18

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 
Submit

About Alan Chumley

In the newly-created role of Director, Measurement, Alan works with clients from the business development phase all the way through their relationship with Hill & Knowlton, identifying the ideal metrics for defining, and then measuring success. Alan marries his background as a communications practitioner with a deep understanding and experience in measuring communications to deliver measurable impact. An active blogger and frequent speaker, Alan is also a resource on trends, theories and the latest insights in measurement. Prior to joining Hill & Knowlton, Alan was the Vice-President, Business Development, at Cormex Research, a Canadian media content analysis and measurement firm. Before this, Alan held increasingly senior positions on both the client and supplier side including: CNW Group (formerly Canada Newswire) as Director, Media Intelligence Services; Bell Canada as Associate Director of Corporate Communication, and ING Canada as Marketing Communications Specialist. Alan is a graduate of the University of Waterloo and holds a post-graduate certificate in public relations from Ryerson University and an M.A. in communication and culture from York University with research focusing on media effects and uses, audience analysis, reception studies and best practices in PR management and measurement. Alan teaches a course in research and program evaluation in Ryerson University’s post-graduate PR certificate program and is a member of the Canadian Public Relations Society’s Measurement Committee.