Welcome to Collective Conversation Sign in | Join | Help

Measurement PRoponent / PRomulgator

 
Musings about all things communications measurement: myths, milestones, metrics, missteps, best practices.

Strategic Forethought not Tactical Afterthought

 …a cheesey but useful slogan I use in dozens and dozens of lunch ‘n learns, client meetings and speaking engagements to drive the much written about (Jim Grunig, KD Paine, Mark Weiner, multiple contributors to and members of the IPR measurement commission) theme about the importance of using a data driven / focused / centric approach to communications.  Bringing science to the art if I can borrow a theme from the IPR.

It’s not (at least exclusively) about measurement.  It’s about research.  In fact, as many who do measurement for a living would say, I don’t see the distinction between the two.  And when I say this in lunch ‘n learns, client meetings and speaking engagements, this is where I feel like I’m starting to loose half the room. 

I say that we (the industry writ large) often think of measurement as something that comes exclusively at the end of a campaign and research as something (if it’s thought of more than strictly as a pitch hook) that is formative pre-campaign.  And while unfortunatley and in reality there may be some truth to that, it’s also ture that we use one to accomplish the other.  We use research to measure.  Research IS measurement.  Measurement IS research.     They are one in the same.  They are part of the same continuum.  They are part of the same thought process. 

While I’m not a huge fan of the RACE (research, analysis, communication, evaluation) formula, at least it urges us to think about the “R” and the “E.”  The irony, however, is that the industry is often in such a race to get a pitch or a plan out the door and to get to the end of a campaign that it’s all too often heaved to the curb.  We’re often so focused on telling that we’re not listening..  Research is listening.  Critique of the RACE formula aside, there’s a reason why it’s in text books.  It works.  

Perhaps it’s largely the speed, among many other reasons (budget, expertise, fear) that sets up a situation where the industry gets bogged in the micro tactical, silo’d, episodic measurement muck.  It’s difficult but necessary to pull up and out of that micro measurement muck and look at the macro and strategic.   And that macro and strategic view is hardly rocket science.  It’s a management by objective approach that can be applied to any discipline.

When stuck in the muck, it can be useful to look at examples of projects that have done it right.  Where research has been used strategically, at the right stages and in all the right ways.  The award-winning case studies on the IPR’s website, for example, are a source of inspiration. 


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Published 07 December 2007 10:53 by Alan Chumley

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

  • r » Strategic Forethought not Tactical Afterthought said:

    December 12, 2007 09:56
  • Michael Blowers said:

    The problem, as always when you try to introduce science to the art, is that we are largely dealing with 'artists'. The PR discipline has traditionally attracted that type of person, although with the increasing importance of social media I would argue that your typical PR person now needs a broader range of skills - being a craftsmen of words is not such a pre-requisite.

    As research has climbed the agenda so PR is becoming more grown-up and I strongly believe that as it enters puberty so the science and research will gain more traction (and hopefully less yawns from the audience!). Wow, just think of what measurement will be like when PR's got grey hair!

    January 16, 2008 16:49
  • Alan Chumley said:

    Completely agree with you, Michael.  Bridging the left brainf right brain gap hurts for some.  It hurt me, but I did it.  As a recovering flacktitioner turned measurement wonk, that's what I tell my account director colleagues.  

    January 16, 2008 19:07

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 
Submit

About Alan Chumley

In the newly-created role of Director, Measurement, Alan works with clients from the business development phase all the way through their relationship with Hill & Knowlton, identifying the ideal metrics for defining, and then measuring success. Alan marries his background as a communications practitioner with a deep understanding and experience in measuring communications to deliver measurable impact. An active blogger and frequent speaker, Alan is also a resource on trends, theories and the latest insights in measurement. Prior to joining Hill & Knowlton, Alan was the Vice-President, Business Development, at Cormex Research, a Canadian media content analysis and measurement firm. Before this, Alan held increasingly senior positions on both the client and supplier side including: CNW Group (formerly Canada Newswire) as Director, Media Intelligence Services; Bell Canada as Associate Director of Corporate Communication, and ING Canada as Marketing Communications Specialist. Alan is a graduate of the University of Waterloo and holds a post-graduate certificate in public relations from Ryerson University and an M.A. in communication and culture from York University with research focusing on media effects and uses, audience analysis, reception studies and best practices in PR management and measurement. Alan teaches a course in research and program evaluation in Ryerson University’s post-graduate PR certificate program and is a member of the Canadian Public Relations Society’s Measurement Committee.