Welcome to Collective Conversation Sign in | Join | Help

Brendan Hodgson

 
Insights from a Canadian PR practitioner on the implications of digital and social media on corporate communications, crisis, issues and reputation management.

Digital PR and marketing - Dare to define or be defined

The other day the boss and I were talking numbers, specifically, the ongoing rise in online spending across WPP companies. While it wasn't possible to identify what portion of that spend was on digitally-related PR versus online advertising (granted, I haven't really tried, though I'm sure there is some spreadsheet in the vaults of the mother company that provides that data), the hamsters were certainly churning over how to translate this trend into more revenue for H&K Canada.

Pontiac's decision to move it's entire marketing budget for its G5 online shows that the potential is certainly there. The question, however, is how to integrate digital PR into the marketing mix. Without doubt, the lines between PR and advertising are much greyer online. At the same time, I've already fought (and lost) a number of battles with ad agencies to retain ownership of digital projects that also have PR elements included. Why is this? Is it because PR agencies themselves haven't truly defined what digital PR is (apologies for the poor grammar)? Should we even be trying to define it lest we once again find ourselves confined to that similar niche we typically find ourselves in the traditional PR role ie. PR = "media relations" (albeit social media vs mainstream media)? 

My firm belief is that PR must always be working hard to demonstrate it's value in the online world. And while this typically is less so when it comes to more corporate, public affairs, reputation and internal communications issues, when it comes to consumer and B2B marketing I am convinced we have to become even more creative and innovative in defining our niche and our value. Because I do believe that there is value in engaging PR firms that have a strong understanding of online behaviours and the various channels and tools used to reach and engage these audiences. The question is how?

My thoughts:

  1. Don't think just PR. Think holistically, across all disciplines and feed in ideas even if they're executed by others. Big picture thinkers will always be asked back to the table. 
  2. Bring to bear your understanding of non-traditional marketing channels, and their increasing importance - employees, suppliers, and other champions - on reaching out to and influencing consumers/buyers.
  3. Look beyond the short-term marketing hit and build on the importance (and value) of building long-term relationships and (dare I use the word) conversations with influencers and consumers themselves.

 

Published 29 August 2006 08:42 by Brendan Hodgson

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

  • Leo Bottary said:

    Richard Edelman's post Game On addreses this subject as well.  Here was my response to his post:

    PR people, with rare exception, are not in the C-Suite because we have a history of wearing our insecurity on our sleeves and using strategies such as "accreditation" to achieve self worth. We have done a horrific job managing our own reputation. How can we expect a CEO to believe that we should take the lead in managing theirs?

    Clients want strong, self-assured leadership. Do you think they care whether it comes from the ad guy or the PR guy if its smart and will help the business? The landscape is changing rapidly, and if anything, we are better positioned to step up here. Richard's message is right on target, but until we adjust our role as messenger, we're screwed.
    August 29, 2006 16:02
  • Leo Bottary said:

    You're probably wondering how I really feel.  Sorry for such an ambiguous response.  Speaking of apologies, please refrain from apologizing for "conversational grammar."  You'll have of us saying "sorry" every other sentence!  
    August 29, 2006 16:11
  • Brendan Hodgson said:

    Hi Leo, thx for the comments, and sorry for saying sorry :-) While I agree that senior executives probably don't care where the ideas come from, very often it isn't the C-suite that we deal with - and I think that has implications in and of itself. Regardless, that shouldn't change the equation that we need to be smarter, more self-assured, and more creative in thinking beyond the traditional confines that define PR. Does this make it a talent contest between PR and advertisers? To claim outright that advertising should follow PR would likely see me out the door as being purely self-serving. One of my favorite lines (coined by others, not me) is: "don't tell people you're funny. Tell them a joke." It's appropriate. To simply claim ownership over any space would be self-defeating both to us and to the client as it implies that we're ignoring the bigger picture. Ultimately, we have to prove and demonstrate that we are entitled to counsel the c-suite - in any capacity - and that introduces issues beyond simply out-dated definitions of what PR and advertising represent.  
    August 29, 2006 19:07
  • Leo Bottary said:

    Totally agree.  We can't tell people we're smart, we have to behave in a way that allows them to reach that conclusion on their own.  It's where I was coming from when I spoke of self-accreditation as being self focused not client focused.  As David Maister would say, we'll never achieve "trusted advisor" status until we demonstrate that we care about our clients first.
    August 29, 2006 19:51
  • Colin said:

    I know it doesn't add much value, but: Amen, Brother!

    The best defense is a good offense. Rather than trying to define PR's share of the online world and fend off all attackers, we should be fighting to lead integrated campaigns - at least at the level of strategy
    August 30, 2006 13:08

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 
Submit

About Brendan Hodgson

An 11-year PR veteran and H&K Canada's Vice President, Digital Communications, Brendan specializes in the areas of Digital Communications and Social Media, specifically helping organizations more effectively use the web, social media and its associated tools and technologies to inform, educate and engage their target audiences. When not doing this, and if time permits, he pursues his other passion in the areas of issues management and crisis communications. He speaks regularly to clients and at conferences on the issues of digital communications, social media, and online crisis and issues management.