Welcome to Collective Conversation Sign in | Join | Help

Bill Keller vs. John McCain. And the Winner Is????

So what lessons does the New York Times vs. John McCain battle have for us corporate crisis folks?
 
Lesson #1 -- Preparation.  Obviously the McCain camp knew this was coming, and they made use of that time to prepare -- creating key messages, developing proof points, lining up third party advocates, etc.    Companies facing a crisis typically have some advance warning -- sometimes just a few days, but often weeks if not months.  The McCain camp couldn't control when -- or even if -- the story would break, but they were prepared to move on a moment's notice, and they did.
 
Lesson #2 -- Regain Control of the Agenda.  The McCain camp was brilliant in its execution of a strategy to reframe this story and thus capture the high ground and controlling the agenda around it.  The story rapidly moved from one about questions over the Senator's judgement to questions about the newspaper's judgement.  When media are more interested in what Bill Keller has to say in defense of the story than in what John McCain has to say in defense of his character and his actions, that says something about who is the winner in this battle.
 
Lesson #3 -- The Goodwill game.  Senator McCain had built a reserve of goodwill amonst key audiences that could make or break him.  So when he had to call on that reserve, it was there for him.  By and large, he enjoyed the benefit of the doubt.
 
Lesson #4 -- The Trust Factor.  Perhaps the public don't hold politicians (or corporate America) in very high regard.  But what this exercise taught us is that they have even less regard for the media.  People were generally disinclined to trust the New York Times, and thus were prepared to discount the story, regardless of the merit of the assertions the story made.
 
Lesson #5 -- The Impact of Unrelated Events.  Often, unrelated events can either worsen a crisis situation or at least affect the manner which that crisis is viewed.  In this case, in the weeks prior to the McCain story being published, there were a number of instances where the media's conduct relative to the Presidential campaign was called into question.  That recent criticism of the media gave greater legitimacy to the "The Times stepped over the line" theme.
 
Lesson #6 -- The Blogosphere makes noise.  And lots of it.  This story immediately became the beauty queen of blog topics; everyone's favorite.  And today's blog noise can become tomorrow's main headlines in the traditional press.  Again, the McCain camp was ready to exploit this. 
 
All of these lessons have practical application for corporate crisis planning. 
 
So who's the winner?  No brainer.  McCain on a TKO.  But he better watch out, the media need to publish something new every day, and this story line is sure to return.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

  • David Ferrabee said:

    Hi Chris,

    I am interested about what it says about America too.  Are those who vote for Mr McCain most likely to be upset by this?  And less likely to turn out for him?  Has Bill Clinton's record on a similar matter affected his wife's chance of being elected in that party?

    And, of course, it's always fun to compare it to France.  What if Mr McCain was going through a messy divorce and then romancing, say Jennifer Lopez, would that be good or bad for him?

    There is an interesting question of audiences here: who is affected by this and how?  Do NYT readers represent any base for Mr McCain?  Or is this about November when everyone's a prospective constituent?

    Cheers

    /df

    February 26, 2008 07:59
  • Chris Gidez said:

    David -- This matter has already been assigned to the "meaningless trivia" category in this campaign.  if the NY Times thought that their story would prompt a closer examination of Senator McCain's record and conduct, they clearly misjudged the mood of the public and underestimated Senator McCain's ability to manage such criticism, the power of the internet and talk-radio commentators to rapidly reframe a debate, and their own reputation problems.

    In the past, the NY Times was seen as a bellwether of the mood of the public.  Not so any more.  Part of that is due to the weakening position of newspapers in general, but much of it is also due to the polarization of the media, and the NY Times is seen more and more as out of touch with the American public.

    This story may have had more resonance in the Fall during the general campaign (and if it in fact has a "smoking gun," which it did not), but the Times was forced to run it at this time.

    This has been, and will continue to be, a fascinating campaing with truly historic implications, but this matter will be nothing more than an irrelevent footnote in the larger scheme of things.

    Stay tuned....

    February 26, 2008 13:28
  • Chris Gidez said:

    David -- This matter has already been assigned to the "meaningless trivia" category in this campaign.  if the NY Times thought that their story would prompt a closer examination of Senator McCain's record and conduct, they clearly misjudged the mood of the public and underestimated Senator McCain's ability to manage such criticism, the power of the internet and talk-radio commentators to rapidly reframe a debate, and their own reputation problems.

    In the past, the NY Times was seen as a bellwether of the mood of the public.  Not so any more.  Part of that is due to the weakening position of newspapers in general, but much of it is also due to the polarization of the media, and the NY Times is seen more and more as out of touch with the American public.

    This story may have had more resonance in the Fall during the general campaign (and if it in fact has a "smoking gun," which it did not), but the Times was forced to run it at this time.

    This has been, and will continue to be, a fascinating campaing with truly historic implications, but this matter will be nothing more than an irrelevent footnote in the larger scheme of things.

    Stay tuned....

    February 26, 2008 13:28
  • jorge israel said:

    como podria incorporar material de uds a mi blog?

    March 2, 2008 13:30

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 
Submit