Robert Gray contacted me just over a month ago to answer some questions on blogging for a feature he was writing for
The Grocer magazine.
It's now published in the 10 June issue, and is a good introduction for an industry that probably hasn't thought much about social media beyond the usual "these people have too much time on their hands".
Amongst all the answers to his questions, Robert picked up on my criticism of Flora's Lulu campaign (
I wrote about this previously). He also lifted some of my other responses for the 'Blogging Great' and 'How to Blog' sidebars. To be fair to the guys at Flora I'm not sure they ever called it a blog, but the principles are the same.
Anyway, here are the rest of his questions and my responses - you can decide whether he chose the best quote.
Adriana Cronin-Lukas is also quoted, and
Stormhoek gets a nice mention too,
Hugh.
Good
examples of FMCG brands bloggingThe best example in
my view is Stormhoek, the South African winery (
http://www.stormhoek.com). Stormhoek's blog
is their website, and by engaging with bloggers they have become the
most well-known wine manufacturer in the blogosphere. They sent bottles to any
blogger who requested one (many of whom then wrote a review on their blogs),
supplied wine for the many social gatherings that bloggers arrange, and even
involved bloggers in the design of their label. As a result, blogging doubled
Stormhoek sales in less than twelve months.
Bad
examples!The worst one I have
seen is from Flora pro.activ. They thought that because their advertising
campaign involved publishing a diary "written" by Lulu, they could just post
these same diary entries on their website and call it a blog. Blogging is about
direct communication, not pushing an advertising message down people's throats.
Luckily this "blog" no longer exists.
Is it a good
time to start brand blogging?Any time is a good
time, as long as you know what you're doing and why. If you don't, then it's a
very, very bad time.
As far as the term
"brand blogging" goes, remember that brands don't blog - people
do.
What are the
potential advantages and pitfalls?
Advantages: You can
communicate directly with your customers. Blogging is a conversational medium
and consumers want companies to come down to their level and talk with them, not
broadcast their message at them from on high.
Pitfalls: You may
not like what consumers have to say, may be inclined to ignore them, or respond
disproportionately. Ignorance is a cardinal sin - the conversations are taking
place, whether you care or not.
What are the
dos, don'ts and risks?
Dos: Listen, engage
and build relationships. Read and analyse the conversations, engage with the
participants where appropriate, and use your brand to facilitate relationships
between your consumers and with you.
Don'ts: Don't think
you can control the conversation - you can't. Don't think that is a bad thing
either - you'll be surprised what happens if you cede some control to your
customers (which is what you do every time you sell a product, by the
way).
Risks: The biggest
risks come from within the organisation. Blogging is disruptive and that scares
a lot of brand managers (not to mention their bosses). Their job is to minimise
risk in order to defend a market position. But remember that your customers
dictate this, not you. Help them to help you.
How do you
avoid getting it horribly wrong?
Take proper advice
from people who can demonstrate that they are active participants in the
blogosphere themselves. Just because your advertising agency tells you they know
all about blogs doesn't mean that they do. Ask them where their own blog is and
read it for a while. If they don't have one, then walk away.
Also make sure that
you have policies and guidelines for your staff. I challenge any big FMCG
company to tell me none of your staff blog. I will find you one.
Many will
have personal blogs of their own that you don't know exist, and may even talk
about your company on them. Others may not have blogs at all but may comment or
contribute to online discussions and be perceived as representing you. But
please do not just call the lawyers in - engage your employees by asking them to
draft the guidelines.
Finally, don't think
that you can control what is being said about your brand online. You can't.
However, you can listen to and learn from it, engage directly with your
supporters and detractors, and faciliate relationships that will ensure your
customers defend your brand for you.
Who ideally
should run the blog - a specialist agency, client marketer, junior
employee?
It depends - there
are benefits to all approaches, but they are appropriate in different
situations. What you need is advice about what is right for your
company, not someone else's.
How much
freedom of expression should there be?
As much as is
appropriate for your brand. If you have a shy, conservative brand, then you'll
get trampled in the onslaught. If your brand is loud and risk-taking, then you
need to be out there shouting and taking risks, otherwise people will wonder
what's up.
If there is
lots, what effect might this have on the way the brand is
perceived?
Companies have very
little control over how their brands are perceived online. Perceptions are
created and shaped by consumers. Trust in governments, companies and the media
is at an all time low. Blogging is revolutionising communication because people
trust other people. If you're a brand manager, it's worth reminding yourself of
that fact every day.