Archive for December, 2007

The political attack ad as a model for digital discourse…

posted by Brendan Hodgson

Forget about public amateur slagging matches via blog posts… this should be the new model for reputation mud-slinging and other forms of intellectual (and not so) verbal ejaculate and self-indulgent puffery… A much more creative and civilized approach, don’t you think?

(courtesy of neatorama)

 

Understanding hearts and minds is at the heart of social media

posted by Brendan Hodgson

Not to flog a dead horse until it’s deader still (grammar cops, back off!), but I’m going to pick up on a topic that my fellow Ottawan and social media evangelist Joe Thornley touched on yesterday, and which has been circulating through the PR blogosphere for a while now.

I agree with Joe and Shel and others that “ownership” of social media is a nebulous concept at best and, to Joe’s eloquent point, will be ”owned” by the individuals who “who have the imagination and intelligence to explore and understand social media’s potential” regardless of their discipline (I have stated as much in recent heated debates). Likewise, I share Joe’s position that social media speaks to many of the skills that forward-thinking PR practitioners inherently understand or, at least, should understand – including deep knowledge of the audiences we need to reach and engage.

But it begs the question: simply because our segment of the communications industry has the terms “public” and “relations” as its moniker, does it automatically make us experts in understanding these communities, and how best to engage them? Have we as PR practitioners truly developed these skills and do we fully understand this changing dynamic?

Sure, we claim to understand the media environment. But as the noted historian and critic, Jacques Barzun, once put it: “Whoever wants to know the heart and mind of America had better learn baseball, the rules and realities of the game — and do it by watching first some high school or small-town teams.”

It is that depth of understanding that is essential to the appropriate application of social media.

And that is the challenge that not only our industry, but any communications discipline, now faces as we seek to extend our offering into the social media space. Understanding the technology implications of social media is not enough. It also requires deep understanding of the communities we hope to engage through social media, and the “rules” and “realities” by which they play.

There are agencies out there that get this – PR and otherwise. It’s why we’ve hired experts in specific fields that understand (because they’ve been – and still are – active participants in these communities) the unique perspectives of specific communities – be they of “interest” or “geography, and why we rely so heavily on our knowledge management and research teams to shed ever more light on the perspectives that unite and drive these communities. It is a strategy that speaks to the increasing importance of direct-to-stakeholder engagement – which is at the heart of social media. And it’s why David, myself and the digital team work extremely closely with these experts to ensure our counsel reflects these unique perspectives.

As we look to engage directly with stakeholders using social media – particularly those communities that already exist online – we must, as Joe puts it, “escape the shackles of media relations”. However, we must do this by not only joining and contributing to communities of interest, but knowing the “hearts and minds” of those audiences we need to reach.

Xmas Wish List for Mesh08

posted by Brendan Hodgson

So Mesh is back, and once more they are seeking the wisdom of the crowd to help guide their 2008 speaker selection… and while none of my (truly brilliant) ideas were picked up from last year, I’m hoping that perhaps my suggestions for 2008 – which while they fall mostly into the PR stream – are a bit more realistic…

Drum roll please:

  • Danah Boyd… because for most young people, social media is not about business. It’s about life in all its bad-ass beauty.
  • Case studies, case studies, case studies… they’re there, you just have to look for them
  • Trend talk I: building social networks that target more niche-focused communities
  • Exploring the intersection of digital and PR from a non-marketing perspective: reputation, issues management, crisis (Mattel, Beacon etc… the new role of employees as “brand guardians”)
  • Trend talk II: impact of mobile on social media and marketing
  • Per Joe’s suggestion, a panel (vs perhaps a single speaker) on measurement and metrics - because 4 minds will be better than 1 (as there are no real experts yet that have the answers… although we’re trying our damndest) and it could get all hot and bothered. Which is a good thing.
  • Trend talk III: Video (what’s old is new again)

Into the abyss, boys. Sorry I missed last years (although you got my money), but looking forward to 2008.

Activist hoax shines spotlight on media behaviour and crisis in 2.0 world

posted by Brendan Hodgson

Audacious? Absolutely. Did it fool the media? You bet. Was it legal? To be determined. One more reason why corporations should take the web and social media seriously?  Unquestionably.

What’s this all about? How a grassroots environmental coalition calling itself “Rising Tide” yesterday fooled some of the world’s most respected media when they issued a fake press release announcing that the United States Climate Action Partnership (USCAP) - which includes BP, Dow, Alcan, GE and others among its membership – had agreed to cut their greenhouse gas emissions 90 percent by 2050. In support of the fake announcement, the campaign organizers also linked the release to a fake website (now shut down) - which mirrored the real website of USCAP identically. 

As a result, and in a clear demonstration that in today’s media environment the need to be first increasingly trumps the need to be accurate, traditional media, along with a number of bloggers, immediately jumped on the story without verifying the accuracy of the report, resulting in USCAP having to release its own statement to refute the fake announcement.

Pie in the face for media. Profile for the hoax organizers. And what for USCAP? In my view, an opportunity to talk about their plans and objectives in light of this controversy, and to communicate their story more broadly… which according to Wired, “USCAP actually calls for 60 to 80 percent reductions in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, and has pushed for coal plant carbon capture and sequestration technologies.“  

Moreover, this type of action only reinforces the need for organizations to be aware of what is happening in the digital space, and be prepared to move quickly to counter misinformation, misreporting and speculation.