<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Enterprise 2.0 a crock?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.hillandknowlton.com/niallcook/2009/08/27/is-enterprise-20-a-crock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.hillandknowlton.com/niallcook/2009/08/27/is-enterprise-20-a-crock/</link>
	<description>Combining marketing and technology to develop new markets and grow existing ones</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 11:35:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.hillandknowlton.com/niallcook/2009/08/27/is-enterprise-20-a-crock/comment-page-1/#comment-2763</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.hillandknowlton.com/niallcook/?p=521#comment-2763</guid>
		<description>I agree with your definition as Enterprise is just a label... Because in my opinion Enterprise 2.0 is knowledged based technology which
allows group of people to interact with one another which happens in any organisations for the employees/staff to have some sorts of interaction
as what you mentioned in this blog post... And Enterprise 2.0 will solve the business problem and it will make the staff-customer relationship bonded t
together as one community... I also agree with you that i will not change the world but it changes the business model in a better way.. If we say it can change
the world..I will say YES if all the organisations make used Enterprise 2.0 and when it becomes prominent in term of its used in business prospectives...
So I guess other words for Enterprise 2.0 is collaboration, participation, involvement and connection... 
For more issues regarding Enterprise 2.0. Read more from my blog http://samloveenterprise.wordpress.com and leave some comments.. Your idea looks really great to
me... Thanx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your definition as Enterprise is just a label&#8230; Because in my opinion Enterprise 2.0 is knowledged based technology which<br />
allows group of people to interact with one another which happens in any organisations for the employees/staff to have some sorts of interaction<br />
as what you mentioned in this blog post&#8230; And Enterprise 2.0 will solve the business problem and it will make the staff-customer relationship bonded t<br />
together as one community&#8230; I also agree with you that i will not change the world but it changes the business model in a better way.. If we say it can change<br />
the world..I will say YES if all the organisations make used Enterprise 2.0 and when it becomes prominent in term of its used in business prospectives&#8230;<br />
So I guess other words for Enterprise 2.0 is collaboration, participation, involvement and connection&#8230;<br />
For more issues regarding Enterprise 2.0. Read more from my blog <a href="http://samloveenterprise.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://samloveenterprise.wordpress.com</a> and leave some comments.. Your idea looks really great to<br />
me&#8230; Thanx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E L S U A ~ A KM Blog Thinking Outside The Inbox by Luis Suarez &#187; Executing Enterprise 2.0: Dachis Group Acquires Headshift</title>
		<link>http://blogs.hillandknowlton.com/niallcook/2009/08/27/is-enterprise-20-a-crock/comment-page-1/#comment-2624</link>
		<dc:creator>E L S U A ~ A KM Blog Thinking Outside The Inbox by Luis Suarez &#187; Executing Enterprise 2.0: Dachis Group Acquires Headshift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 21:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.hillandknowlton.com/niallcook/?p=521#comment-2624</guid>
		<description>[...] would think as well you have been reading further up on the huge number of reactions that Dennis&#8217; article has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] would think as well you have been reading further up on the huge number of reactions that Dennis&#8217; article has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IT Project Failures mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://blogs.hillandknowlton.com/niallcook/2009/08/27/is-enterprise-20-a-crock/comment-page-1/#comment-2609</link>
		<dc:creator>IT Project Failures mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.hillandknowlton.com/niallcook/?p=521#comment-2609</guid>
		<description>[...] value in real solutions. But, in fact, a primary focus of Enterprise 2.0 is facilitating ‘getting things done&#039;.  Find the intersection where ‘getting things done&#039; crosses with the triage for issues and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] value in real solutions. But, in fact, a primary focus of Enterprise 2.0 is facilitating ‘getting things done&#8217;.  Find the intersection where ‘getting things done&#8217; crosses with the triage for issues and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Enterprise 2.0 Causes Cancer and What You Can Do About It &#124; CloudAve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.hillandknowlton.com/niallcook/2009/08/27/is-enterprise-20-a-crock/comment-page-1/#comment-2605</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Enterprise 2.0 Causes Cancer and What You Can Do About It &#124; CloudAve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.hillandknowlton.com/niallcook/?p=521#comment-2605</guid>
		<description>[...] Niall Cook Marketing Guy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Niall Cook Marketing Guy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esteban Kolsky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.hillandknowlton.com/niallcook/2009/08/27/is-enterprise-20-a-crock/comment-page-1/#comment-2588</link>
		<dc:creator>Esteban Kolsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 22:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.hillandknowlton.com/niallcook/?p=521#comment-2588</guid>
		<description>I know what you mean.  I would say that your post was great, but that is just a label.

Instead I am going to say that I bookmarked it to send to the next E20 vendor that comes my way asking me to evangelize their solution as the way to E20.

Well done, concise, and with examples - what else you need?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what you mean.  I would say that your post was great, but that is just a label.</p>
<p>Instead I am going to say that I bookmarked it to send to the next E20 vendor that comes my way asking me to evangelize their solution as the way to E20.</p>
<p>Well done, concise, and with examples &#8211; what else you need?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wibisono Sastrodiwiryo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.hillandknowlton.com/niallcook/2009/08/27/is-enterprise-20-a-crock/comment-page-1/#comment-2574</link>
		<dc:creator>Wibisono Sastrodiwiryo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.hillandknowlton.com/niallcook/?p=521#comment-2574</guid>
		<description>i read his post

his main question is:

&quot;In the meantime, can someone explain to me the problem Enterprise 2.0 is trying to solve?&quot;

from this &quot;question&quot; i can see that he has a wrong perception about E.20

he sees E2.0 as a tool instead of a concept

just like people who sees SOA as a technology, when SOA not delivered what people expected then they start to saying SOA is dead, then many other new terms arise with the same old underlying concept: services</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i read his post</p>
<p>his main question is:</p>
<p>&#8220;In the meantime, can someone explain to me the problem Enterprise 2.0 is trying to solve?&#8221;</p>
<p>from this &#8220;question&#8221; i can see that he has a wrong perception about E.20</p>
<p>he sees E2.0 as a tool instead of a concept</p>
<p>just like people who sees SOA as a technology, when SOA not delivered what people expected then they start to saying SOA is dead, then many other new terms arise with the same old underlying concept: services</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  file_get_contents(http:) [<a href='function.file-get-contents'>function.file-get-contents</a>]: failed to open stream: Invalid argument in <b>C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\wp-includes\class-feed.php</b> on line <b>97</b><br />

